Bones of Contention
Nearly 20 years ago, the State Historic Preservation Division was created to guard Hawaii's history in the face of rapid development. Today, Hawaiian activists, archaeologists and even developers say it's not doing its job.
(page 3 of 5)
Photo by Olivier KoningAt Wal-Mart on Keeaumoku Street, cultural descendant Paulette Kaleikini pushed the state to rebury dozens of Hawaiian remains unearthed during the construction of the big box store.
A Problematic Past, An Uncertain Future
Trouble at SHPD started before General Growth announced its plans for the Ward Village Shops, even before administrator Melanie Chinen took over. In 2002, state auditor Marion Higa slammed the division for a laundry list of offenses:
- Staff archaeologists often took months, sometimes years, to review reports.
- A burial program staff member accepted $1,000 from a developer whose project unearthed 200 burials.
- One-third of its employees took vacation or sick leave without recording it.
- Staff members worked for other employers during state hours for which the division compensated them.
“We recommended that the governor intervene to ensure that the management of the State Historic Preservation Division is improved,” the auditor stated. “We also recommended that the department chair and division administrator take steps to improve the protection of the state’s historic properties and to prevent the misuse, abuse and theft of the division’s limited resources.”
Melanie Chinen was a member of that audit team. She understood the internal problems with the division. That’s one of the reasons Gov. Linda Lingle appointed her administrator in 2004. But in the three years since, some of the old troubles appear to have worsened and new ones have surfaced.
At least 22 people have left the division, which has only 24 positions, since Chinen took over. Half a dozen were people she had hired herself. The continual turnover at the division has left few remaining archaeologists to deal with the hundreds of development plans, archaeological surveys and reports that were already overdue for review, plus the new ones arriving every day.
In early 2006, Chinen hired Chris Monahan as the lead archaeologist for Oahu. The position had been vacant for a year when he arrived, creating piles of paperwork that needed SHPD’s scrutiny.
“When I came in, there were literally stacks everywhere, so I just started shoveling, reviewing as fast as I possibly could,” Monahan says. “In the month of March, I did 112 reviews. A lot
of them meant digesting a 3-inch-thick report.”
After four months, Monahan realized that nothing would change. After eight, he quit. “I was working as hard as I possibly could and doing my best trying to help the whole system, everyone who depends on the process working, and I rarely had more than an hour to look at something,” he says. “I look back, and I think I would’ve made different or better decisions if I’d had more time.”
But there was never enough time for archaeologists at the division. Each of the four major islands is supposed to have its own lead archaeologist. Three of them are also supposed to have assistant archaeologists. But as of mid-September, there was only one lead archaeologist and two assistants—three staffers doing the work of seven.
Maui’s lead archaeologist, Melissa Kirkendall, resigned from a post she’d held for seven years. She sent a letter to her colleagues, noting that there were more than 400 permits and archaeological reports pending review on Maui and the Big Island. “Given the present state of the Historic Preservation Division, we are no longer facilitating our ethical obligations,” she wrote.
Developers in the private and public sector, on all levels of government, are well aware of the slowdown at SHPD. For a government project, it could postpone work on a much-needed water main or highway. For a private developer, the bottleneck affects the bottom line.
“Basically you’re paying just to have [the land] sit there,” says Matt Slepin, senior planner at Chris Hart & Partners, a planning consulting firm on Maui. “Particularly on Maui, where you have relatively high construction activity, developers want to secure contractors as early as possible. So you’re paying them to do nothing until you have your permits in place. All that money’s been thrown away.”