Schools

Editor's Page: What's the Difference?

Hawaii’s public schools face challenges, we’re told. None of them turn out to be unique.


Photo: Linny Morris

This month, we once again take stock of Hawaii’s public school system. It’s a feature that’s become an annual commitment, and, each year, we get accused of dwelling on the negative. No one likes to get bad news, so I suspect there’s an element of “blame the messenger” to this reaction.

We would not need to do these articles if Hawaii’s schools were a beacon of excellence. We would probably never have taken up this crusade if our schools were even average, ranking say, 25th in the nation. But they don’t. They consistently rank near the bottom, and have for years—so we must do these articles, because it’s our job, our responsibility, to help our readers understand their community better so that all of us, the Hawaii public, can do something to make life better.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

If Hawaii has one of the worst public school systems in America, which state has the best? Maryland, according to the January 2009 “Quality Counts” report by the nation’s newspaper of record for education, Education Week.

So what makes Maryland, and not Hawaii, so successful in running its schools? What’s so different about Maryland?

Nothing.

The Maryland example explodes every defense I have ever heard as to why Hawaii’s Department of Education has such a hard time delivering results.

Ever hear someone say Hawaii doesn’t spend enough on students? Our annual operating budget for the state DOE is $2.4 billion, drawn from federal, state and local sources, for about 159,000 students. That’s $15,214 per student.

Maryland spends $12,426 per student, drawn from federal, state and local sources.

Ever hear someone blame the local teacher’s union for putting teachers above students (yes, including here in these pages over the years)? Maryland teachers belong to all sorts of unions, too—the American Federation of Teachers, Baltimore Teachers Union, Maryland State Teachers Union.

 Ever hear someone say, “Hawaii’s student body includes a lot of foreign-born kids who don’t even speak English, so what do we expect the teachers to do with them?” The Annie E. Casey Foundation tracks statistics such as these,  to help “vulnerable kids and families succeed.” According to its Kids Count data center, 4 percent of Hawaii children have difficulty speaking English, or about 9,000 kids, as of 2004. In Maryland? It’s 3 percent, or 26,000 kids.

Ever hear someone say that the DOE has a lot of high-poverty schools, where the kids have a miserable home life and no family support for education? As of 2006, the poverty rate in Hawaii was 9.3 percent. In Maryland, it was 7.8 percent. Yes, Maryland has poor people, too, dysfunctional families, teen pregnancy, gang violence and all the social ills that seem to come with poverty. Ever watch The Wire?

Ever hear someone say, “The private schools siphon off all the ‘good’ students, so all the DOE gets are the challenging ones. Imagine what our DOE math and reading scores would look like if their averages included all the high achievers at Punahou and Iolani!”

Nationwide, about 11 percent of school-age children attend private schools. In Hawaii, it’s an unusually high 18 percent.

In Maryland? An unusually high 18 percent.

Look, folks, we don’t have to settle. Somebody out there knows how to do this whole public school thing. I don’t think any of us in Hawaii—taxpayers, teachers, parents or students—would mind it one little bit if our DOE would lean over Maryland’s shoulder and do the right thing:

Copy its homework.
 

 

HONOLULU Magazine invites you to comment on our articles and the issues they raise. Comments are moderated for offensive language, commercial messages and off-topic posts. Some comments may be chosen for inclusion in the magazine on the Feedback page.

Reader Comments:
Old to new | New to old
May 11, 2009 09:30 pm
 Posted by  seenit

I’ve been a sub teacher for many years and I’m no apologist for the Hawaii DOE, but come on, saying Hawaii’s educational system should be close to Maryland’s based on statistics is so not right. (At least I’ve learned some Valley Girl grammar.) Remember how, based on statistics, local sportscasters and sports fans sounded before undefeated Hawaii played no. 2 Georgia in Sugar Bowl 2008? It all looked good on paper, but it was more about what made the two teams different that decided the game, and in education it’s more about what Hawaii doesn’t have in common with Maryland that sets the two states apart. For starters: Maryland is one of the original 13 colonies, it borders four states and our nation’s capital (which also includes all the headquarters of all the branches of federal government), it has the highest median household income in the U.S., it has pro sports franchises, it has Johns Hopkins University, and on and on. You can’t tell me there’s no ripple effect when all this talent, leadership, wealth and diversity is concentrated in and around Maryland, regardless of how much it mirrors Hawaii in some education categories. In Hawaii, the ripple we get is when the Pacific Ocean laps on our shores. Oh, we did match Maryland in one area: In 1967, our political leaders adopted Maryland’s land law to enact land reform in Hawaii. (P.S. I am not a subscriber, but I happened to read the latest issue of your magazine.)

May 19, 2009 04:15 pm
 Posted by  Local Mom

Right sub teacher. Let's devote more time to make excuses, rather than try to solve the problem. Your entire comment is about excuses, not solutions. The article challenges us to improve YOUR system, banana!

Jun 11, 2009 11:09 am
 Posted by  TOT DAD

I think the editor states point blank that Education is not about the money, but really about what we, parents, teachers, and citizens of the state of Hawaii want to do about it. Do we want better for our school aged children? I think the question we need to ask is what do we want out of school. If the goal is to educate children to they can go to the mainland to college and get a job - yes compare to a highly competivive system such as Maryland. If the goal is to create future International Pacific Rim economic center,then maybe. I think Hawaii needs to take lessons from a state such as Maryland, but be wary of why such condintions exist there. Highly diversified demographics, proximity to federal goverment and federal programs, urban, and a long history of centralized government and education. Many conditions here in Hawaii are similar: federal government (military) jobs and urban. However, the culture here is very different as well the demographics and industry. Striving for such "excellence" is sometimes the worst enemy of "just good enough", the latter of which Hawaii education is struggling. Look for a Hawaii (not Hawaiian) solution that incorporates the goals of this uniquely diversified population and economy. I agree with the editor that it is not about the money, but about how we are doing that is essential for achieving the goals that we ourselves must set.

Add your comment:

Create an account, or please log in if you have an account. Anonymous comments are enabled.




Forgot your password?
Verification Question. (This is so we know you are a human and not a spam robot.)

What is 8 + 7 ? 


Search:

Also in this issue: